This text offers a feminist philosophical analysis of contemporary public skepticism about women's memories of past harm.

This text offers a feminist philosophical analysis of contemporary public scepticism about women's memories of past harm. It concentrates primarily on writings associated with the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF), founded in 1992 as a lobby for parents whose adult children have accused them of some abuse after a period of having not remembered it. FMSF has been identified as the group most directly responsible for encouraging what has become an unprecedented distrust of alleged victims' memories of physical abuse. Campbell uses these false memory debates as an opportunity to explore how people may be politically undermined when their memory competencies are challenged, and how our theories of memory must change to reflect this reality. She argues that the casting of current controversies about memory as theoretical questions about the nature and reliability of mental processes and about whether we can find scientific support for recovered versus false memories, covers up and displaces what is also a public contest about the cultural status of women as rememberers and, therefore, as moral agents.

Constructing the "memory wars"
respecting rememberers
framing women's testimony - narrative position and memory authority
the subjects of therapy - revisiting trauma and recovery
"the feeling of identity is quite wanting......in the true woman" - models of memory and moral character
suggestibility, misdesign and social scepticism
the costs of a stereotype - defending women's confidential records
a singular and representative life - personal memory and systematic harms.